|
USICRs Elect New Officers
Republicanism Exercised within USI College
Republicans
Friday, November 16, 2007
In
the wake of Musharaf's imposition of martial law, abolition of constitutional
republican-style government in Pakistan, the USI College Republicans
celebrated fundamental
patriotic constitutional republicanism
Thursday night with organizational elections at the University of
Southern Indiana. All five elected Executive Board positions were
replaced.
Here are the new USICR officers:
Dan Otto,
Executive Chairman
Nathan Brooking, Internal Vice Chairman
Renee Seib, External Vice Chairman
Roley Saldana, Secretary
Kelly Clem, Treasurer
Congratulations
to the new office holders and thanks to those who participated in
the elections. The transfer of power was peaceful and the hand-off
from Gary Lashley's Administration to Dan Otto's Administration
was in good taste, unlike when Bill Clinton and the Clintonistas
trashed the White House prior to George Bush taking power.
To apply for any of nearly 20 appointable (by the Executive Chairman)
officer positions, visit the officers page and apply or contact
Dan Otto at dtotto@usieagles.org
for more information.
USI is No 'Dud' when it comes to a Nationwide, Week-long
Empty Holster Protest
USI College Republicans to Organize Students
at USI in Peaceful Protest of Incredibly Dangerous, Life-threatening
Restrictions on Firearms on Campus(es)
Thursday, Oct. 18, 2007
For
the next week from Mon., Oct. 22 thru Fri., Oct. 26, at USI and
many other campuses around the country, students will make a sensible
statement that they should be able to carry firearms for the protection
of themselves and others on campuses, from the likes of Seung-Hui
Cho (Virginia Tech mass murderer).
Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC) recently announced
their intention to hold a nationwide, week-long "Empty Holster
Protest" -- to make it known that something productive must
be done to counter the incredibly deadly attacks at Virginia Tech
last year, among others in our history. Something must be done to
return campuses to the safer place they were considered before rampent
gun restrictions hamstrung hard-working, decent people from carrying
firearms on campuses. It's widely known, and most university officials
even admit, that text messages, website announcements, increased
security patrols, cameras, or other "security" devices
cannot stop a slaughter
like witnessed with the Virginia Tech Massacre (where 32 people
died in Virginia in 2006 in the matter of minutes) and Luby's Massacre
(where 24 people died in Texas in 1991 in the matter of minutes).
Some of the least safe places currently in America are schools,
as can easily be assessed by the trajedies at Virginia Tech, Columbine,
and others.
This effort also comes on the heels of the decision by the Utah
Supreme Court to approve of a state law granting students to carry
weapons on campus. That law, now in effect since 2004, has not caused
students to kill people randomly as many people ignorantly speculate.
For a list of responses to arguments about guns on campus, view
the SCCC Arguments page.
The best answer truly is to trust the high caliber, law-abiding
citizens, as most of us are, with the ability to perform these duties,
as we ably do with many areas of our lives everyday. There are good
people willing to protect themselves and others -- but they are
being told not to -- and they are abiding by that. That's what produces
massacres like Virginia Tech, Luby's, Columbine. This is detrimental
to all of us and it needs to change.
Thanks to the similar efforts of a group just a few miles from our
campus, the 2nd Amendment Patriots, the first ever lifetime conceal
carry permit was passed and signed into law in Indiana. Governor
Daniels recently reinstated state parks as firearm-friendly places
within the state, as well. In an effort to continue this trend toward
liberty in our state, our universities and other public ground should
remove restrictions on legal permit holders to protect themselves.
After all, Article I, Section 32 of the Indiana Constitution reads:
"The
people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves
and the State." Indiana
Constitution, Article I, Section 32
A "right" has no small meaning in American jurisprudence.
Dictionary.com mentions that a "right" is something "that
which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees" and
until the Indiana Constitution is replaced or that section amended,
as the governing document that applies to all state activities,
including the University, that right should not be contravened.
The Indiana Constitution clearly implies the right has full range
of motion, and that the USI College Republicans in coordination
with SCCC are right to request an abidement of our Constitutionally-guaranteed
rights.
For more on the upcoming week's event, check out www.concealedcampus.org
for more information, the online home of national sponsors of the
event, Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC). Chris Brown,
a Texas political science student said he founded SCCC because:
"As a college
student and a concealed handgun licence holder, when I step onto
campus I am left unable to defend myself. My state allows me to
carry a handgun in public, but there is some imaginary line drawn
around college campuses for silly reasons. And those silly reasons
are getting people killed, raped and robbed." SCCC Founder,
Chris Brown
We encourage students and others on the USI campus
between Oct. 22 and 26, 2007 to wear empty holsters to peacefully
lodge a complaint with university officials and state officials,
in the spirit of civil disobedience handed down to us originally
by our Founding Fathers, including Thomas Jefferson, James Madison,
Alexander Hamilton, George Mason, Patrick Henry, and other patriots
who would undoubtedly stand with us in this if still here, but will
have to be on campus with us in spirit.
"No free
man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason
for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is
as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
- Thomas Jefferson
"(The Constitution preserves) the advantage of being armed which
Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...
(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
--James Madison
"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that
they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton
"To disarm the people (is) the best and most effectual way to
enslave them..." -- George Mason
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone
who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve
it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are
ruined...The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone
who is able might have a gun. --Patrick Henry
"Tell the American people never to lose their guns. As long as
they keep their guns in their hands, what's happened here will
never happen there." - A dying Chinese Citizen shot in Beijing
We hope to see many of you wearing your empty
holsters this coming week!
* * * * *
Covering the First Televised Republican Presidential Candidate Debate
Ten sensible candidates
vieing for the position
Thursday, May 3, 2007
In contrast to Senator Gravel last week saying
during the Democrat debate that "many of the candidates on
(that) stage freightened (him)," this week we saw comradery
among the Republicans and Senator Sam Brownback even said that "these
are a set of quality candidates" regarding fellow Presidential
hopefuls. That was one of the significant differences between the
two debates.
Ten official candidates were featured at the debate, including:
Senator Sam Brownback, Governor Jim Gilmore, Mayor Rudy Guiliani,
Governor Mike Huckabee, Congressman Duncan Hunter, Senator John
McCain, Governor Mitt Romney, Congressman Ron Paul, Congressman
Tom Tancredo, and Governor Tommy Thompson. It was held at the Ronald
Reagan Presidential Library in California and televised through
MSNBC, with Chris Matthews moderating. Just as last week's answers
by the Democrats peaked our interest (or disturbed us, more like),
this debate was an interesting exposé.
Sam
Brownback
When asked about the Roe v. Wade case whereby the U.S. Supreme Court
essentially legalized abortion, Brownback said it would be a "glorious
day" when it was overturned. He said, "I believe life
is one of the central issues of our day, I believe that every life
is unique...the child of a living God."
Regarding faith and the family he stated that "we've had 50
years of people trying to run faith out of the public square...we
shouldn't be running it out, we should invite (faith) in and celebrate
it" He also said that we should "build stronger families and a stronger
culture...rebuild the family structure."
In regards to whether embryonic stem cell research would be necessary,
Brownback said, "it will not...we are doing so with adult stem cells."
Regarding the Republican Party and 2008, Brownback said "we win
as a party when we talk about ideas...that's why we will in 2008
because we value ideas."
When asked about the Terri Schiavo case, Brownback was one of the
candidates that supported that effort by the U.S Congress -- "it
gave her and her family the right to make an appeal" and when asked
whether another Clinton in the Whitehouse was a good idea, he said
"raising taxes, not standing up for life or marriage" are just a
few reasons to keep that from happening.
Regarding terrorism and foreign policy Brownback asserted "we will
have a very strong aggressive foreign policy" and said "Iran
is the terrorism sponsor of the world, we have to be agressive and
confrontational with them."
Rudy
Giuliani
Mayor Rudy Giuliani started the debate
by saying "what we can borrow from Reagan, considering we are
in his library, is his sense of optimism"
In regards to one of the issues many Republicans agree with Giuliani,
terrorism, he stated that "we should never retreat in the face of
terrorism -- a terrible mistake." When asked about a way to
identify potential terrorists, he is on record saying "every person
who comes in to our country...should have a tamper proof card."
With an amazingly unemphatic answer, Giuliani replied "it will be
OK" when asked about repealing Roe v. Wade -- he said that the "states
should decide" their own answers to the abortion question.
Giuliani reaffirmed his personal feelings abortion by saying that
"I hate abortion" but he qualified it by saying "you have to respect
a woman's right to choose, different than my own conscience."
Matthews asked a strange question as to whether the increase in
Christian conservatives within the Republican Party has been a good
thing and Giuliani said in an almost unconvinced fashion "sure."
Talking about how he reduced the welfare rolls by about 660,000
people in New York City, Giuliani said "I ran one of the most conservative
governments in New York City."
Regarding taxes, Giuliani proposed that "we have to repeal
the death tax" and that it's important to "regularize the rates"
of taxes for all people. He didn't specify if this would be in an
income or consumption-based tax system within his proposal.
On the charged issue of the starvation and dehydration of Terri
Schiavo, he said that it would have been better to leave Congress
out of the issue. He went so far as to say that it would have been
"much fairer -- in front of court." As a reminder, an inhumane court-ordered
death was the reason that the case was brought before the U.S. Congress
in the first place -- to be able to allow the family to bring the
case before a federal judge.
(More coverage on this will be posted
within the next few days)
* * * * *
Faculty Contracts
Not Renewed, Chairmanships Revoked at USI
The faculty advisor of The Aerie magazine
during its release of soft core porn was not retained
Friday, April 27, 2007
To
make an interesting story at USI that we reported on last year even
more intriguing, the university has decided not to renew the contract
for Dr. James McGarrah, an english professor at USI and faculty
advisor of The Aerie magazine. It is now clear that by commenting
on McGarrah, Michael Kearns has lost his position as English department
chair. USI's policy is strict on fellow university officials commenting
on personnel maters.
The controversy surrounding The Aerie magazine occurred just this
past September and October. Some of McGarrah's most ardent supporters
are saying they think it has something to do with the move to include
a nude photo of two women in bed together, touching and one stimulating
the other. News
25's story on Thursday, April 26, 2007 speculated that the incident
is likely to have had a "hand" in the non-renewed contract
for McGarrah. Sarah Cornell, reporting for News 25 was seen holding
a copy of The Shield student newspaper which featured the photo
originally printed by The Aerie.
What gets lost in the story about The Aerie and the nude lesbians
in bed together is that considerable taxpayer and student funds
were used in the production of the magazine. This is the original
reason that some on campus were offended -- that everyday state
taxpayers and students could have inadvertantly played a role in
publishing porn.
Of course, this all comes on the heals of a story of an Evansville
west-sider just beyond the USI campus, Gordon Wright, who has been
charged with two misdemeanors by "littering" the area
with pornographic photos.
* * * * *
Covering
the First Televised Democratic Presidential Candidate Debate
Delirious, Rabid Liberalism
on Display
Friday, April 27, 2007
The first televised debate to usher in the
Presidential Race of 2008 featured the eight Democratic candidates
currently in the running: Senator Hillary Clinton, Senator Barack
Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Joe Biden, Senator Chris
Dodd, Congressman Dennis Kucinich, and Senator Mike Gravel. It was
held in South Carolina and televised through NBC and MSNBC, with
Brian Williams moderating. Some of the answers peaked our interest,
so we thought clueing you in on the details of how they would run
the country, if God forbid they were elected.
Hillary
Clinton
About "Hillarycare" Clinton said "the mistakes I made
about healthcare a few years ago (were) deeply troubling to me"
-- and they were to all of the rest of us. A portion of her healthcare
agenda included coercion upon the American people. The idea that
someone who is desperate and needs medical care would be charged
$25,000 per incident if they received medical care outside of her
system is nothing short of insane public policy and Soviet-style
healthcare. She also said she wanted to "control and decrease
costs for everyone," which any reasoned person knows is a formula
for disaster.
When Brian Williams asked what she would do if two cities were nuked
simultaneously she responded, "having been a senator during 911,
I understand how important it is." Then she added an amazing
statement: "That doesn't mean I would be looking for other fights."
So, you really wouldn't care of thousands of Americans died, Senator
Clinton? You would be more concerned about "how the international
community views the United States" as many liberals cite.
Barack
Hussein Obama
The question was asked of Obama of a time he could remember when
he made a mistake or mistakes and he cited the effort by Congress
to save Terri Schiavo's life, to him a time when the "government
got more involved than it should have." Schiavo was starved
and dehydrated for nearly 14 days based on very shaky testimony
that she wanted to die by a man that had already left her for another
woman. This is not to mention Schiavo's reason for entering into
her vegetative state was very suspect.
Williams asked if Obama was willing to stand by a statement that
he made recently noting, "nobody has
suffered more than the Palestinian people," and Obama did reinforced
the statement to then qualify it as referring to the fact that their
leaders were much of the cause of it.
In a weak presence on security issues, Obama commented that he "would
have effective emergency response" if two cities were destroyed
by a nuclear bomb and that he "would find out who carried it
out." Is this all of the reassurance that we can expect from
Obama and Democrats if two cities were leveled and thousands or
even millions of our fellow citizens were systematically slaughtered?
(More coverage on this will be posted
within the next few days)
* * * * *
USI Denies
Animal Rights Extremist
Gary
Yourofsky Stopped from Promoting Inhumane Propaganda on Campus
Friday, April
26, 2007
After
becoming aware of his incredibly disturbing website, USI officials
had no choice but to cancel the upcoming speaking engagement for
Gary Yourofsky slated for Monday, April 2, 2007.
Among other insane rantings, Yourofsky actually actually said that
he would not be against harming humans and burning down buildings
for the sake of animals.
The incredible part of the story is that USI was gearing up to host
Yourofsky except for the fact that Dr. Glen Kissel, USI engineering
professor and faculty advisor of the USI College Republicans, noticed
a link to Yourofsky's organization ADAPTT website from the official
USI Press Release, which is not customary. The USI News Office must
not have done their homework, and if they did then they should be
ashamed, because Yourofsky's website stated quite clearly to the
casual viewer on introductory website pages that he supported nonviolent
and violent actions for the sake of animals. As listed in
the USI Handbook, this advocacy to break federal and/or state law
by Yourofsky disqualified him from being an elligible campus speaker.
FrontpageMagazine, a national magazine dedicated to academic
freedom, ran
a full-length article on April 19, 2007 regarding Dr. Kissel's work
to bring awareness to this issue.
Here are just a few statements straight from Gary Yourofsky's ADAPTT
website as of March 29, 2007 -- what may seem like "rantings
of a madman." As is noted on the website by Yourofsky himself,
some of the below quotes are as recent as from 2005:
- "The time has come to forcibly free
our family members [pets, animals] from their captors, even if
that means injuring or killing someone in the process." (emphasis
added) http://www.adaptt.org/animalrights.php#
and click "What's Wrong with Violence?"
- "However, since violence is an essential
part of activism, even if an abuser of animals perished during
a fire or other form of direct action, I would unequivocally support
that, too." http://www.adaptt.org/animalrights.php#
and click "What's Wrong with Violence?"
- "Given the choice of apathy or someone
liberating mink, burning down a research torture-laboratory, or
killing a vivisectionist or other DIRECT murderer of animals,
I will choose the aforesaid actions over apathy any day of the
week." (emphasis added) http://www.adaptt.org/animalrights.php#
and click "What's Wrong with Violence?"
If that isn't enough, Yourofsky has the
following views about procreation:
- "In fact, I think human breeding
should be illegal (emphasis added) as well until all the UNLOVED,
UNWANTED, HOMELESS children are adopted." http://www.adaptt.org/animalrights.php#
and click on "Dogs and Cats"
He goes even further on other topics, including
a belief that humane societies are slaughterhouses:
- "We love them so much, we breed
them, and breed them again, and breed more of them, and then breed
even more of them until we end up murdering every year 10-18 million
UNLOVED, UNWANTED, HOMELESS dogs and cats in those slaughterhouses
that we euphemistically refer to as shelters or humane societies
(emphasis added)." http://www.adaptt.org/animalrights.php#
and click on "Dogs and Cats"
- "There are a myriad of problems
with having companion animals...I wish I could take away the domestication
of dogs and cats from thousands of years ago. It was a bad idea
to take them out of their natural environments." http://www.adaptt.org/animalrights.php#
and click on "Dogs and Cats"
- "Stop donating to ineffective, welfare-based
animal rights corporations like PETA and HSUS"
http://www.adaptt.org/about.php
Even though officials chose the logical
action by cancelling Gary Yourofsky's speaking engagement at USI,
one must wonder about the circumstances in which the professor or
instructor who invited the speaker would actually think Gary Yourofsky
is a good influence on or had a positive message for the students.
Dr. Maurice Hammington, an ethics professor at USI, reportedly had
much to do with Yourofsky's scheduled speech. In fact, apparently
Yourofsky has spoken to his class three times in the past.
Yourofsky has spoken nearly 1200 times at high schools and universities
with his perverse form of veganism, highlighting human suffering
as an acceptable means to protect animals. This is apparently not
his first cancellation, as a violent outburst by Yourofsky at East
Tennessee State University in 2003 is chronicled in an article
from the Johnson City Press. He was driven over the edge by
a professor that had provided a cart of documents citing some of
the benefits of animal research science. It led him to erupt in
anger to the faculty sponsor that invited Yourofsky to speak and
he became abusive toward her, going so far as to relate her by analogy
to the Ku Klux Klan.
Thankfully, due to the efforts of those who are concerned about
the status of our college campuses, Gary Yourofsky will no longer
be spreading propaganda at USI. When considering statements that
may remind some of the situation after the Virginia Tech shooting
involving 32 dead students and professors and 28 wounded, Yourofsky
may have even more difficulty when he attempts to schedule talks
at other high schools and universities.
* * * * *
Soft-corn
Porn Published at USI at Taxpayer and Student Expense
Does the idea of a taxpayer-funded porn
operation at USI bother you?
Friday, September 29,
2006
The
fall edition of The Aerie magazine featured soft core porn funded
substantially with taxpayer and student money. The type of material
typically featured in The Aerie is creative writings and photos.
It just so happened that one of those photos showed two women lying
nude together in bed, touching and stimulating each other. Some
Evansville lawyers commented that this constitutes soft core porn.
The real problem in this story is that taxpayers and students
were forced to be underwriters of porn. A total of $844 Indiana
government money was used to produce The Aerie. Student tuition
dollars amounting to under $656 and student activity fees of $500
were additional monies used in the printing of The Aerie.
Also
contained within The Aerie magazine was a
picture of a topless woman in the woods.
The Shield student newspaper subsequently ran a story on the issue,
wherein their own faculty advisor, Patricia Ferrier, opposed the
inclusion of the photograph in their print edition. It was still
published, and many copies of The Shield's first printing were stolen.
Interestingly, television stations when reporting the story have
had to blur the image
of the two women in bed together. That combined with Patricia Ferrier's
opposition
to publishing it in the student newspaper begs the question: Why
is it in any way appropriate to include soft core porn in The Aerie
at taxpayer and student expense?
* * * * *
New Blog
at Townhall.com
The Eagle's
Quill Flies in to the Rescue
Monday, August 21, 2006
Townhall.com,
a blog famous for hosting renowned columnists including Michelle
Malkin, Dennis
Prager, Charles
Krauthammer and others, welcomes a new face..err.."beak"
to the mix: Eagle's Quill.
Available
at http://eaglesquill.townhall.com,
the new project is managed by Dr. Glen Kissel in cooperation with
the USI College Republicans. The blog is updated daily and designed
to offer a platform for Dr. Kissel and the College Republicans to
candidly and intelligently discuss current events. Please read
and let us know what you think.
* * * * *
Putting
the 'ISM' in TerrorISM
USI
to host speaker trained by International Solidarity Movement
Thursday, February
23, 2006
A
February 14 press release[article]
from USI announces the presentation “Life in Occupied Palestine"
which is to be delivered February 27 by Anna Baltzer[website],
a Jewish American member of the International Women’s Peace Service.
The speech, which is to be held in Carter Hall D, is designed to
outline Ms. Baltzer's activities in the Middle East including "information
about checkpoints, settlements, environmental issues, the olive
harvest, Israeli activism, the Separation Wall, and the growing
Palestinian and Israeli nonviolent resistance movement against the
Occupation."
Further
investigation by USI College Republican faculy sponsor, Dr. Glen
Kissel revealed some disturbing facts about Ms. Baltzer.
In Ms. Baltzer's blogs dated
11/18/03 and 5/20/05, it is mentioned that she was trained by the
International Solidarity Movement (ISM). The ISM is characterized
by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz as "active supporters
and facilitators of Palestinian terrorism" (The Case for
Israel, pp.170-171). Dershowitz further outlines that the ISM
has recieved "'funds from both the Palestinian Authority and Hamas...."
Based on an interview with
terrorism expert Steve Emerson, the Jewish Journal of Greater Los
Angeles[article]
concludes that "The ISM collects information for terrorist
groups to use." It further quotes Prof. Dershowitz that "The
ISM provides legitimacy to terrorists...."
The Anti-Defamation League[article]
reports that "The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs has warned
that ISM activity 'at time' is 'under the auspices of Palestinian
terrorist organizations.'"
Media
coverage. . .
Mideast
conflict 'not a war about religion at all' -
Evansville Courier & Press
Israeli
critic to speak at USI -
Evansville Courier & Press
Speaker
at USI Stirs Skepticism - News 25
* * * * *
"While government economic planning may sound attractive, it
is fundamental that in order for a government social
program to work we all must be fitted into it. Those who
will not fit voluntarily are coerced. That's
why they must build walls around socialist countries to keep people
in to enjoy the benefits." - Former Republican
Ohio Congressman Bob McEwen
* * *
USICR Testimonials: How you feel about USICR
"I've never been more mentally stimulated
than at CR, even in all my classes." Jason LaMar
"There's only one way to escape the liberal garbage at USI,
that's USICR." Ryan Monar
Let us know how YOU feel!
* * *
"They
are young, intelligent, involved and have a good sense of humor.
And whether you agree with their politics, one thing is certain:
We need more of them in the community." - The
Evansville Courier on the USI College
Republicans, July 8, 2003 [for
the original
article] or [on
our site]
* * *
|